![]() ![]() “Anything he’s already raised, he can’t raise that post-conviction unless he’s found something new or there is something he didn’t know or couldn’t have known before,” said Terry Ekl, a prominent Chicago-area defense attorney who is not involved in the case. The court found there was evidence that Peterson killed them to prevent their testimony.Īttorneys say that means Peterson must have something new to say. And the Illinois Supreme Court ruled that the use of hearsay testimony by Savio and Stacy Peterson - whom Drew Peterson is suspected of killing though he has not been charged in her death - did not violate his constitutional right to confront his accusers. They have dispatched the argument that Brodsky was ineffective. ![]() Much of what Peterson argues has already been shot down by judges and courts.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |